Date: 2011-11-20 11:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tlrmx.org
I'm not sure how your "statement in his defence" would do anything for his defence. Mitigation, maybe, but I don't see any defence here. And the mitigation was already entirely successful. That's why they're back home.

While getting arrested is not the _point_ of civil disobedience, it is entirely within expectations that you'll be arrested and convicted. Agg. Trespass is pretty easy to prove, the police officers knew perfectly well that they had no need to characterise the protesters other than as "non-violent and sensible" since they weren't charging affray or any other crime which that supposition would contradict.

And Joint Enterprise is easy to prove too. No specific individual need to be proved to have done anything, if it can be established that it was done by the group and that the individual charged, a member of that group, would have reasonably foreseen that it might be done (e.g. Joint enterprise murder for shooting a guard during an armed robbery). A group of people agreed to trespass (in Fortnum & Mason) knowing they may interfere with lawful activity (shopping) carrying on there, and some of them do so. Joint Enterprise Agg. Trespass. Guilty.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

nmg: (Default)
Nick Gibbins

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23 242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 08:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios