nmg: (angry)
[personal profile] nmg

I've now phoned Trading Standards at the City of London, and they can find no record of a condition on the license for the Melton Mowbray that would prohibit children. This would seem to contradict the duty manager's assertion that no children were allowed as a condition of their license. They also seemed interested that the Melton Mowbray were unable to show me the license copy or summary that they're required to have prominently displayed.

The next step will be to phone Fuller's head office and ask them to explain themselves.

Date: 2007-01-05 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pinguthegreek.livejournal.com
You're a great dad and I think you'd be a great person to have on side in an argument generally!

Date: 2007-01-05 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
sounds like a barrel of laughs
=/

Date: 2007-01-05 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegreatgonzo.livejournal.com
I have often found bar staff use "it is against the terms of our license" or "it is illegal" where what they mean is "we don't want to" or "the manager doesn't like it so wont let us." The subject of this in my case is usually the serving of snakebite. The silly thing is if they had said that in the first place I would have gone "fair enough, your gaff, your rules."

As far as I am concerned you are rightly peeved to be lied to like this, did you repair to the Penderals Oak?

Date: 2007-01-05 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
Good Lord I dislike the Penderil's Oak (if by that you mean the one in Holborn)... SO many bad beer experiences in there -_-

Mind you, there aren't that many pubs in the area large enough to accommodate more than about 20! My favorite, the Seven Stars, can comfortably fit ...oooh 25?

Date: 2007-01-05 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
The point of going to the MM was not to drink per se, but to meet up with the London SF crowd and possibly have a swift half before heading back to Waterloo. As it was, we managed to say hello in passing to most of the usual suspects before being thrown out. I'll remember the Penderal's Oak for future.

If they'd had a sign which read "No Children. No Dogs. No Irish." by the door, I'd feel slightly better disposed to them. To the best of my knowledge, the publican reserves the right of admission, so if they want to add extra conditions I can't really argue. However, don't lie by dressing it up as a legal imperative.

Date: 2007-01-05 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegreatgonzo.livejournal.com
It used to be great, I think it is now suffering from the "weatherspoons has got to large" issue which means that it is far more a matter of luck these days as to whether the current staff know what real beer is about.
As to the other thing, if you aren't going out in a large group then you are right in saying there are some much better pubs to go in. I mentioned it as it probably has the best access round there if they and these days JDW are child friendly.

Date: 2007-01-05 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegreatgonzo.livejournal.com
As discussed above, the Penderels Oak is not the best pub in the area but it will be [livejournal.com profile] garklet friendly.

Date: 2007-01-05 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gmh.livejournal.com
As poor timing would have it, [livejournal.com profile] clanwilliam turned up about 5 minutes after you'd left.

Date: 2007-01-05 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
There's always a table to be had in there, that's for sure. I can't remember the policy on children offhand though, but JDW are generally family-friendly. There's also a very large non-smoking area at the back.

Date: 2007-01-05 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com
To the best of my knowledge, the publican reserves the right of admission, so if they want to add extra conditions I can't really argue. However, don't lie by dressing it up as a legal imperative.
What you said. They can make up their own barmy rules (IIRC several Wetherspoon's have a "no hats" rule, presumably for the good of their CCTV), but they shouldn't pretend it's a legal thing if it isn't. And not having the licence to hand is definitely a Thing.

Date: 2007-01-05 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clanwilliam.livejournal.com
And flick promptly yelled "you just missed them!" and told me the whole story.

Date: 2007-01-05 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegreatgonzo.livejournal.com
I'm fairly certain that when they decided to switch to a child friendly policy and introduce a children's menu they did the whole estate.

Date: 2007-01-05 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
Arse. Feck. Etc.

Date: 2007-01-05 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
That's my recollection too.

The downside is that they also seem to have introduced TVs showing football to much of the estate at the same time.

Date: 2007-01-05 02:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
And that'll be the gist of my complaint to them.

Date: 2007-01-05 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegreatgonzo.livejournal.com
Luckily I live in a city with no end of good pubs catering for all tastes, from stupid numbers of well kept ale to those supporting my tastes in music so I rarely need to venture in to a JDW/LN1 house.
I still occasionally go in, when other people have picked the meeting pub or for cheap and fast food.

Date: 2007-01-05 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clarehooper.livejournal.com
Good on you! What a rubbish pub. Good luck with it all!

Date: 2007-01-05 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
The buggers!

I suspect it's a hangover from before the 2003 Licensing Act, which abolished the previously confusing morass of legislation and licensing conditions about whether and where under-16s were allowed anywhere in a pub, or a room where there's no bar, whether they can walk past the bar to the loo, who they have to be with when, etc etc.

Being charitable, they might have got confused if the place doesn't serve food (apart from crisps, say) since the Act says children under 16 aren't allowed in pubs that are "primarily or exclusively for the sale and consumption of alcohol" ... without an accompanying adult. They might have missed that last bit.

Does sound like a good time for the application of the paper cluebat of righteousneses!

Date: 2007-01-05 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] del-c.livejournal.com
I'm of the same opinion of several other commenters: it's not the turning away customers, it's the turning away customers, and then lying about why. That's just cowardly, and the duty manager deserves a rocket from both Fullers head office and Trading Standards about it.

The irony is that he did what actually is illegal, in deceiving you about the terms of the site's licence.

Date: 2007-01-05 03:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
If they'd had a sign which read "No Children. No Dogs. No Irish." by the door ...

... then they'd almost certainly be guilty of racial discrimination and be risking prosecution under the Race Relations Act as variously amended.

Date: 2007-01-05 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
The downstairs bar (where we were) serves food, but admission of children is still at the discretion of the licensee.

Date: 2007-01-05 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
Having now spoken to the licensee and to the relevant person in Fuller's head office (see this post), they're pretty unrepentant about their policy, but did apologise that we were given incorrect information about why we were turned away.

Profile

nmg: (Default)
Nick Gibbins

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23 242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 29th, 2026 11:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios