It read like "oooh, Daleks and Churchill, what a great idea!" and then they realised they had no plot to go with it, so went with generic ideas instead.
I distinctly remember thinking "Hmm, if they just loaded the super-bomb into that thing that can teleport back onto the dalek ship, we'd never see the daleks ever again. And I'm OK with that".
Even if the rest of the episode had been good, the new power-ranger daleks by fisher price were terrible. And the rest of the episode wasn't good. The highlight of the dialogue was an in-joke about an insurance mascot. Even Russell T Davies could do better than that.
Oh well, the last two episodes were good, 2 out of 3 is not bad at all.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
zvi and
no subject
Date: 2010-04-17 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-17 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-17 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-17 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-17 07:01 pm (UTC)Seconded.
I distinctly remember thinking "Hmm, if they just loaded the super-bomb into that thing that can teleport back onto the dalek ship, we'd never see the daleks ever again. And I'm OK with that".
Even if the rest of the episode had been good, the new power-ranger daleks by fisher price were terrible. And the rest of the episode wasn't good. The highlight of the dialogue was an in-joke about an insurance mascot. Even Russell T Davies could do better than that.
Oh well, the last two episodes were good, 2 out of 3 is not bad at all.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-17 08:07 pm (UTC)