The Browne Review report
Oct. 12th, 2010 11:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Too depressing for words. If I can muster the energy, I'll write a longer commentary later this week. For the time being, let me echo the words of Sally Hunt: "Lord Browne's recommendations, if enacted, represent the final nail in the coffin for affordable higher education."
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 12:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 02:02 pm (UTC)But I would be interested to know what you guys would like to see happen to fix things?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 03:11 pm (UTC)Is it rather then that the preferred approach would be to spend more on universities? Because that's a bit, well.. simplistic? And surely that's just what every area (NHS, schools etc) would like too.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2010-10-13 08:11 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 05:59 pm (UTC)1. It finally extends the funding arrangements to cover part time students too.
2. Charging higher fees to students is marginally preferable to Universities just having less money.
But, yeah, basically, it's rotten to its black heart.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 09:29 pm (UTC)The task for any future govt is to deal with the consequences of this crash diet. It will mean that there is a generation of taxpayers whose consumption is limited and this will have knock on effects in terms demand for houses, consumer spending, etc. The nature of unintended consequences means that we are entering unexplored territory.