"The name's Bear. Edward Bear."
Dec. 8th, 2005 09:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Seen here on officialgaiman:
I see from USA Today that Christopher Robin is being replaced by a "tomboy girl" in order to appeal to the youth of today. http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2005-12-06-winnie-the-pooh_x.htm. Undoubtedly Disney have done lots of marketing research on this. As we learn from the article, "We got raised eyebrows even in-house at first, but the feeling was these timeless characters really needed a breath of fresh air that only the introduction of someone new could provide," says Nancy Kanter of the Disney Channel.
Whatever next? Antidepressants for Eeyore?
I know that Milne's books aren't perfect. They're a little sugary at the best of times ("Tonstant Weader fwowed up", as Dorothy Parker wrote), but the existing Disneyfication makes my pancreas ache with the way it replaced whimsy with sentimentality. I'm not even going to start the rant about my intense hatred of the Disney illustrations compared to E.H. Shepard's elegant originals, since it's a bit of a long one. Since they're not content with butchering it once, they're going to do it again, except this time they're getting rid of the central character, namely the young boy to whom the stories are being told.
I knew I shouldn't have bothered getting out of bed this morning.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 09:51 am (UTC)So not THAT timeless, then, eh?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:06 am (UTC)Last week, Steve and I sold Disney the rights to TOTL.
They promise to stay true to the origional.
Except that Al has been replaced by a talking Toucan.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 10:43 am (UTC)H
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 11:04 am (UTC)('...Winnie the Pooh went thump-thump-thump as another Disney executive slaked his depraved lusts on the bear's rotting carcass.')
I agree entirely about the superiority of Shepard's illustrations; it's one of the (many) reasons I loathe Disney as an entity.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 11:30 am (UTC)That rather puts me in mind of this. I'd almost be more willing to see a new W-t-P project along these lines that what Disney are proposing.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 12:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 02:11 pm (UTC)My loathing for Disney was scarcely reduced when the Ladybird noverisation (!) of The Hunchback of Notre Dame appeared, sans any mention of Victor Hugo.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 01:05 pm (UTC)I agree wholeheartedly, as might be expected.
I could get distressed by Disney's latest stripmining of other people's culture and ideas, but I think the most sensible approach is to just not regard the Disney versions as having anything to do with the works of A.A. Milne, but to continue cherishing the latter for the qualities they have. Disney have made a few short films containing characters with familiar names and passing resemblances to Pooh, Piglet, et al, but these should not be considered to have any connection with the real Winnie the Pooh stories written by Milne.
These are not the stories you're looking for. Move along. Nothing to see here.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 01:17 pm (UTC)GaaaH!
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 09:01 pm (UTC)All this now makes me want to seek out a copy of the Soviet Winnie-the-Pooh films made by Soyuzmultfilm in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 11:56 pm (UTC)- Rob
no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 03:25 pm (UTC)- Rob
Even though I'm a cat person, personally I love that dog...
Date: 2005-12-08 04:20 pm (UTC)Ditto. And for a LONG time. As a kid I didn't even know there WERE different illustrations to the Disney fodder. I loved them when I found them a few years on. But it is the whole Pooh debacle that FIRMLY put me on an anti-Disney footing; no mercy, no compromise.
The dog in question is from the story a few years ago concerning when the Disney Stormtroopers in grey suits. Having finally got control of the property outright - already in the process of the ethnic cleansing of all imagery in marketing relating to the Shepard drawings as opposed to the Disney version - these filth turned up to claim the original toys the characters were based on, to take them to the Disney Museum in one of their two American coastal abominations. As they were being handed over a dog grabbed Roo and ran off. Into what's left of the Hundred Acre Wood.
No amount of searching, following the dog, bribing the dog analysing the dreams of the dog etc etc would result in the recovery of the original Roo.
So somewhere, there is small stuffed baby kangaroo toy, alone in a damp English wood, probably by now wholly decomposed - but forever beyond the vile satanic claws of the most nauseating superpower on the planet. Free.
I love that dog.
(I should make the admission here to still being very fond of, and being able to sing, the cartoon Tigger song.. I'm sorry.)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 09:55 am (UTC)John Kovalic's take on this.