Deja vu

Jul. 15th, 2010 12:34 pm
nmg: (Default)
[personal profile] nmg

So, Vince Cable is proposing a graduate tax. Haven't we been here before?

It's been a while since I posted about HE funding (posts passim), but it's worth repeating some of the highlights:

  • Back in 1997, the Dearing Report recommended that because "those with higher education qualifications are the main beneficiaries [of higher education], through improved employment prospects and pay", "graduates in work should make a greater contribution to the costs of higher education in future". The report goes on to recommend an income contingent scheme along the lines of the Australian Higher Education Contribution Scheme.
  • Richard Gombrich's article from 2000 is still worth reading, and an indication of what HE is likely to suffer in the lifetime of this government.
  • Roy Hattersley was generally right in 2002, and he's still generally right now.
  • The then Education Secretary Charles Clarke heavily hinted at a graduate tax back in 2003. It didn't happen. Instead, we got top-up fees by a vote of 316:311.
  • A graduate tax will not be hypothecated, therefore Universities UK will not support it.
  • A graduate tax will take over forty years to reach steady state (being the period between graduation and retirement), but HE will continue to require support from other sources during this period. Ignore this at your peril.
  • David Willetts is wrong. Before he starts calling for us to "give more value to students and taxpayers", he should be aware that per-capita tertiary funding fell by 50% over the twenty years to 2000. During the same period, staff:student ratios fell from 1:9 to 1:17 (or 1:23 if research funding is excluded). The increase in funding under the last government did not substantially correct this. How much more value does he think there is to give?

I could say more, but not without repeating things that I've said over the past decade.

Date: 2010-07-16 09:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Absolutely confirm this -- overseas students are a complete godsend to the university system. I've taught on courses which would absolutely be uneconomic to run without the high proportion of overseas students wanting the benefits of a British university education (and I think we do provide a good education for that money).

God knows what will happen if this cap on non eu immigration cuts those numbers down further reducing university income.

Date: 2010-07-16 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
yeah I can totally see that overseas students are a welcome cash cow for universities, but from the point of view of the layman (people who live round universities/UK residents faced with not being able to compete against overseas students for dwindling place numbers etc), are there financial benefits to the "wider community" from overseas students?

I'm curious as I've often been asked and I honestly don't know.

Date: 2010-07-16 09:44 am (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker
That the courses are only run in the first place because the overseas students make them economic?

Date: 2010-07-16 09:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Well, in my experience many of the more talented stay on in the UK after university and a source of PhD educated science and engineering students is always useful. In the crude economic sense they also tend to be wealthy (otherwise they couldn't afford the fees) so they're a source of money for the wider community (as that's where they're buying their clothes food and housing for the duration).

Incidentally, I think competing against overseas students for places is largely a myth. In the courses where I've had active involvement with student recruitment the rules we worked to were "we have room for this many funded places for UK nationals and as many self-funding people as we can get" (the latter could be UK, EU or non EU -- non EU is better because they are clear profit whereas UK/EU sort of break even). In other words, I never saw a case of a UK student who did not get in because of a non UK student.

Date: 2010-07-16 10:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
the "overseas student as a source of income for local businesses" is the argument I've always put forward so far. I'm sure there are several shops in our area that can only exist due to the large oriental student populace locally for a start.

I've not had any contact with university admin to be honest, just generally curious as to how it all works out.

Date: 2010-07-16 11:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Well, I must confess I am hardly neutral as for years my wages partly came from income from foreign students but for me it's a great win-win situation. They get a good education and we (both in the narrow sense of the uni and in the wide sense of UK plc) get their money.

Date: 2010-07-16 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cabd.livejournal.com
Overseas graduates of British universities are to be found in governments, industry and NGO's across the globe. Its a very important means by which we project 'Britishness' across the globe, and the knock on impact on our trade, culture and indeed out diplomatic relations is incalculable.

Date: 2010-07-16 11:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Not to mention a reasonable number of the world's top engineers and scientists. The 2009 nobel prize for chemistry went to Charles Kao who did his PhD here at UCL.

Profile

nmg: (Default)
Nick Gibbins

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23 242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 10:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios